Whether benefits exceed costs
Estimate a project’s benefits over its useful life, such as avoided damage, fewer service disruptions, and reduced emissions, and compare their present value with project costs.
We compare the costs of infrastructure and resilience investments with the benefits they provide to residents, businesses, and communities. Agencies use our benefit-cost analyses in FEMA hazard mitigation grant applications, alternatives analysis, and capital planning.
We work with public agencies, utilities, nonprofits, and planning and engineering teams on projects that reduce flood, wildfire, drought, and extreme heat risk.
Estimate a project’s benefits over its useful life, such as avoided damage, fewer service disruptions, and reduced emissions, and compare their present value with project costs.
Compare design alternatives and combinations of investments on the same basis, so partners can see the tradeoffs.
Estimate expected annual losses from flooding and other hazards as a baseline for measuring what mitigation could avoid.
Radbridge has helped communities access more than $40 million in FEMA funding for mitigation planning and projects, including the benefit-cost analysis for a $37 million BRIC grant.
Full benefit-cost analyses for FEMA Hazard Mitigation Assistance applications, using the BCA Toolkit and FEMA-approved methods.
We supported the research behind FEMA’s 2022 guidance on ecosystem services and green infrastructure in the BCA Toolkit, and we quantify these benefits in client applications.
Screening-level assessments identify which projects are likely to be cost-effective before you invest in a full application.
We combine data science with economic analysis and share findings through reports, maps, concise summaries, and web-based tools. Our studies make sources, assumptions, and limitations clear.
Avoided damage to buildings and contents, displacement costs, travel delays and collision risk, service disruptions, emissions, ecosystem services, and health co-benefits.
Present value calculations, sensitivity analysis, and uncertainty assessment, following FEMA and OMB guidance and other agency requirements.
When staff need to rerun the analysis, we build Excel and web tools, such as the Watershed Benefit-Cost Screening Tool and the GSI Impact Calculator.
Yes. We prepare benefit-cost analyses for FEMA hazard mitigation applications using the BCA Toolkit. We can start with a screening-level assessment to see whether a project is likely to be cost-effective.
Often, yes. FEMA’s BCA Toolkit includes ecosystem service benefits for green infrastructure and nature-based projects, and documenting them well can make the difference for projects such as floodplain restoration.
A benefit-cost analysis asks whether a project’s benefits to society exceed its costs. An economic impact study asks how spending moves through a regional economy. Funders such as FEMA require benefit-cost analysis.
Yes. We often join teams led by engineering and environmental firms, using their designs, cost estimates, and hazard modeling in our analysis.
Tell us about the project or funding application you are working on.
Contact Radbridge